Focus/FGW PR Blog

Focus/FGW is a comprehensive advertising agency that offers all of those things you would expect from a marketing communications firm and its public relations clients see results, Proven Results.

Monday, October 23, 2006

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words. Cliché, but true . . . Especially in the PR World

Photography can have either a positive or a negative value in the media. We have all seen the photo of Michael Jackson dangling his baby over the railing at the complete dismay of his admiring public or Britney Spears driving with her baby in her lap. Both images quickly spread like a raging fire through newspapers, magazines weeklies and – without a single printed word – the reputations of both Michael and Brittany were permanently lowered a notch or two. Britney immediately became seen as a bad, unsafe mother who was not capable of caring for her child. Not only was Michael Jackson’s parenting called into question, but his sanity as well.

We have looked at the negative side of photography in media, but there is also a positive side. If a corporate CEO or the President of the United States wants to improve their public opinion, they will often stage “photo ops” of positive things. The CEO of Habitat for Humanity might be photographed while starting a new project or breaking ground. President Bush might be pictured doing regular every day things such as fishing, golfing, or throwing the first pitch at a baseball game. A carefully staged shot can redirect the public’s interest. In the world of PR it is essential that photography be a large part of any PR program or campaign.

When the public sees pictures of well-known icons, it makes more of a lasting impression on us than words. In many cases, photography speaks entirely for itself. No caption, no matter how well written, could change the image of Michael Jackson dangling his baby. It absolutely speaks for itself. As well, the image of Nelson Mandela and de Klerk shaking hands as they received the Nobel Peace prize in 1993 requires no words.

As we have seen, pictures can be used to create positive images for icons or companies but at the same time, they can also produce negative images. Part of the goal of PR is to help maintain companies’ reputation. Pictures are another great way to get a positive message about your company out to public.

delicious digg furl google newsvine reddit Technorati

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good points. What role do you think the ever-increasing paparazzi plays into this, and don't you believe that a negative picture is valued by the American public above a positive picture?

10/30/2006 8:04 AM  
Blogger FG&WPR said...

Paparazzi are only filling the demand created by both consumers and publishers for more information on topics that sell.

I don't believe that negative images are valued more, but often receive more media attention.

Take email as a case in point. Individuals will forward an email with positive images of our troops to their entire contact list and this will be repeated over and over. More people will view these images than the negative images that live in a short newscycle.

Blogs, viral marketing campaigns, social marketing, etc. are poised to reach a larger audience than the mainstream media in the very near future.

To that end, it is not just the media who will control what content is shared and what ends up on the editing floor. With more choices for consumers to get the news important to them, there is more opportunity to display those images that portray companies or individuals in a positive light.

10/30/2006 10:22 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home